Variation of beneficial interest
Saunders v Vautier
Beneficiary can end if
Sui juris
sole beneficiary
vested interest
Extended to trusts with more than one beneficiary
if all in existence and ascertained
Sui juris
All agree
Re Smith
Discretionary trusts
If all objects are ascertained
Sui juris
All agree
Variation of Trusts Act 1958
General rules
Courts can consent if not sui juris
S1(1)(A)
Including those unborn
S1(1)(C)
Cannot consent for capable adult
Knocker v Youle
Only if in their benefit
Tax saving
Disadvantage of being delayed offset by prior life interest surrendered
Re Holt
Being more responsible as older age
Re T
Only a variation not resettlement
Leaves substratum of trust intact
Even if interests are altered
Re Ball's Settlement
Doesn't matter if contrary to settlor's wishes
Goulding v James
Appointment and removal of trustees
Role of settlor
Appoints first trustees
Has no rights to enforce trust
Can't remove or appoint
Unless stated in trust instrument
Express powers
Takes priority
In trust instrument
May nominate someone to exercise power under S36
S36 Trustee Act 1925
Must replace
S36(1)(B)
Or appoint additional
S36(6)
Can't exceed four
Grounds
S36(1)(A)
Outside UK 12 months
Refuses to act or wishes to retire
Trustee has died
Unfit to act
Infant trustee
Incapable
Procedure
Must be in writing
Deed of appointment preferable
S41 Trustee Act 1925
Appoint new trustee in substitution
Only if s36 can't be used
Won't support weak claims
Beneficiary may request
S19 Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
Applies to all beneficiaries
Must give written instructions to trustees
To retire
To appoint new trustees
Must all agree
And be sui juris
Only applies if two trustees left
Can be excluded by trust instrument
Also ousted if trust instrument appoints person to exercise s36
Controlling the trustees
Beneficiaries
Can compel trustees to carry out duties
Court order
Administrative
And dispositive
But not how it should be done
E.g. discretionary powers such as investment
Re Brockbank
Appointment of new trustees was discretionary
Beneficiaries couldn't interfere
Cannot compel them to exercise powers
Must only consider whether to exercise
Will courts interfere with powers?
Dispositive
Only if improper
Tempest v Lord Camoys
Blindly follows settlor
Turner v Turner
If wholly unreasonable
Dundee General Hospital Board
If recipient is not an object
Capricious or irrational
Re Manistry's Settlement
Administrative
Duty of care owed
And duty to balance investments
duty to consult
if in instrument
Or S11 TLATA 1996
Trusts of land only
Can complain if breached
Information
General rule
Need not explain discretions
If they do. Courts can enquire into adequay
Klug v Klug
Exception
Unless has legitimate expectation
Must be warned
Scott v National Trust
Must keep accounts
Beneficiaries may inspect
Evidence eg share certificates
May be inspected
Records of trustees decisions
Schmidt v Rosewood Trust
Courts have discretion to offer disclosure of confidential documents
Will look at all interests involved
Re Londonderry's Settlements
Beneficiaries can't demand documents contain trustee's deliberations of discretions or powers
Saunders v Vautier
Can end trust
If conditions met
Can't compel trustees to act
Retirement of trustees
S36 Trustee Act 1925
Only if being replaced
Should be by deed
Automatically vests property
S40
S39 Trustee Act 1925
If not going to replace
There are at least two trustees left
Remaining trustees consent
Is effected by deed
Express power in trust instrument